Hegels Phenomenology of Spirit, Ecos The Myth of Superman, and CamusThe Fall :: Phenomenology Dialectical Essays

Hegels Phenomenology of Spirit, Ecos The Myth of Superman, and CamusThe Fall It is impossible to truly realize the impact of earlier minds on modern society, simply be establish that which they taught is so intrinsic to thought which followed. peerless great example is G.W.F. Hegel, an eighteenth-century philosopher who first named dialectical relationships. In his book Phenomenology of Spirit, Hegel details the relations between people and ideas in a way that now seems obvious, only if was groundbreaking at the time. He opens his discussion by describing consciousness meeting as master and slave, and describes the development of the interaction in a dialectical fashion. In this particular situation, the slave receives an professional definition from the master, then negates it, since it is not a complete (and therefore an inaccurate) description of the self. The relationship between the two consciousness plays disclose as a progression of a definition, the negation and the result . The common terms given to this movement are thesis (the original posit or definition), antithesis (the negation), and tax deduction (the closing movement combining elements of each of the first two). The synthesis often becomes the new thesis, which is similarly negated. The whole theory can be seen as an elaboration of cause and effect, where the original thesis causes the antithesis which causes a synthesis. There is a direct causal progression. An interesting concept which the dialectic gives rise to is the fact that once a thesis is made everything that comes after is affected by the original posit. For example, one can attempt to negate a label, yet still give validity to the label, and the synthesis will cause the slave, even in the free definition, to define the self in terms of what the master originally defined. Even a negation ends in the original terms, because the original terms were the cause of any definition the slave would create. Hegels theory held prevalence in society for many years, thinkers such as Kierkegaard and Heidegger relying heavily upon the dialectic as a way to further their own theories. Cause and effect became the main way of looking at world events, and life continued until the climax of the twentieth century, which saw a negation of Hegels thought and a shift in the dialectic. In 1972, an English translation of Umberto Ecos The Myth of Superman was published. In this article, Eco, a novice and novelist, discussed the shift from the Hegelian dialectic in light of the Superman saga.

Othello vs O the Modern Spin Essay -- essays research papers

O is a modern spin on Othello that attempts to get by issues that are relevant for a contemporary earreach. However, ultimately the literary value of Othello is lost in this appropriationThe film O directed by Tim Blake Nelson is a recognised contemporary interpretation of Shakespeares classic tragedy Othello, which addresses a number of issues that are relevant to a modern day audience compared to that of the past. The conductor of the film has changed crucial parts of the play which makes the play such a classic, which has essentially ruined the literary value of Othello. This is evident for a number of concepts including, the unconcealed links amongst the play and film, the power of words and language and Iago and his motivesThe director of O has made errors which causes Othello to lose its literary value. Othello is known as classic delicious play however, the director of the film has caused the play to lose this element. Of course the director has made overt links between t he play and the film. The obvious links between the play and the film include the naming of the characters for example naming Othellos character O and naming Desdemonas character Desi. When Desi and O first micturate sexual intercourse they are in a hotel called Willow which represents the song sung by Desdemona when she is about to die. The role of women in the play and the film wait the same, the submissive and obedient type. Yet, in todays society women would be more confident and feministic in their ways. These obvious and almost childlike connections between O and Othello does not necessarily mean that O is effective appropriation of the play. The beauty of Othello is the power of words and language. The play uses articulate... ...n/last line, this shows no reasons. Whats the effect? The character Iago doesnt fulfol the audience curisoty.The new give motives (typical hollywood) drugs and dad brings Iago back to audiences reality of the world and hence destroys a ny substance to character and movie.Nelson goes so furthermost to completely interpret the character of iago incorrectly, and impress his interpretations on the audience. In the film the director has made the mistake of giving Hugo motives such as the use of steroids and his develop saying I love Odin like he is my own son. This causes Hugo to rage with anger and jealousy and therefore plan his devious revenge. This is the typical Hollywood film that spoon feeds the audience so they know exactly what is going on. In the original Iago is given know reason to act like this towards Othello, the audience is left to interpret